Powered by WebAds

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Traveling to the enemy

Last week, three Israeli journalists were called in for questioning by the International and Serious Crimes Unit of the Israel Police. Their crime: They visited enemy countries. One of the journalists who was summoned was Lisa Goldman, who visited Beirut this past summer (See picture of her reporting on Channel 10 news at top left; the picture actually came from Hezbullah's al-Manar television).
According to Goldman, a man identifying himself as an officer with the International and Serious Crimes Unit of the Israel Police called, telling her she was a suspect in an international crime, and that she must report to the unit's Petah Tikva headquarters to be interrogated the next morning.

"I just about fell off of my chair," Goldman recalled. "I thought, this is the craziest phone call that I have ever received in my entire life." Disbelieving, Goldman asked why she was under investigation. The officer responded that he could not tell her, citing that it could enable her to interfere with the investigation.

Within an hour after the call, a police officer reported to her house, carrying a formal document summoning her to be questioned under warning.

"I pretty quickly arrived at the conclusion that it could only be because of my trips to Lebanon," said the veteran journalist and internationally-known blogger. She called other journalists whom she knew to have visited enemy states, such as Iraq, and found that none of them had ever been investigated for their travels. In at least one case, one reporter said that the Mossad had asked him for information after a similar trip, but that he had politely refused to help and the matter was closed.

"There are so many precedents for this sort of trip," said Goldman, citing at least 12 other prominent journalists known to have visited countries considered to be enemy states for the purpose of writing articles.

Goldman said it was only after being notified about the investigation that she contacted legal experts and found that her visit, which she made carrying a foreign passport, had violated the law.

'While I think that this law is unjust and violates freedom of the press, I would never have made the trip had I been aware at the time that it was illegal," Goldman said, adding that she thought it was crucial for Israeli journalists to be able to provide the public with first-hand accounts of news in Arab states, including those listed as enemies.

Goldman said that she was interrogated for four hours, and that her investigators clearly had not read any of her English-language publications. "They didn't know that I spent basically the whole war defending Israel at my own expense while working as a journalist," Goldman recalled, emphasizing that she had given an Israeli perspective on BBC and CNN broadcasts and a number of leading newspapers.

Following the interview, investigators told Goldman not to tell anyone about the investigation. "I didn't even tell my own mother that I was interrogated," she said. Goldman said that she figured that the police would adhere to the same standards.
Word got out because the police put it out. Lisa was one of three journalists interrogated; another journalist had visited Lebanon and one had visited Syria.
Within minutes after her name was mentioned on the next hour's news broadcasts, together with those of the two other journalists - Ron Ben-Yishai and Tzur Shizef - Goldman began receiving calls from acquaintances who had heard about the investigation.

At first, Goldman said, she did not understand how anybody had heard about the investigation which she had kept secret.

The police, she said, still haven't contacted her since the day of her interrogation.

"I think that there is domestic persecution going on here," said Goldman. "I always used to take pride in what a democratic country this is, with such broad freedom of the press."
I'm not sure why Lisa ever thought we have "such broad freedom of the press here," but that's an issue she should take up with some Arutz Sheva reporters (who were prosecuted a few years ago because their station was skirting the law about obtaining a broadcast license) and it's not the subject of this post. The subject of this post is whether the Police's International and Serious Crimes unit should be harassing Lisa and her two colleagues. I believe that the police are wasting their time.

Over at Treppenwitz, David disagrees with me:

While not exactly a Hanoi Jane-worthy performance, there was absolutely no justification for breaking Israeli law to file such a story, and certainly no justification for potentially risking who-knows-how-many lives if someone had decided to disappear her.

Seriously, what if she (or one of her two colleagues) had been kidnapped? How many bus-loads of terrorists would Israel have had to release to buy their freedom? How many Israeli soldiers would have had to put their lives on the line simply because the Israeli Government's assessment of what is - and isn't - unreasonably dangerous (and illegal) didn't cross the minds of a few arrogant journalists trying to make a name for themselves? How much more impotent would our government have appeared if the worst had happened and, for whatever reason, we could not gain the necessary support to act???

Not surprisingly, the press has closed ranks behind these three journalists while ignoring the perfectly valid reasons why such stunts are illegal.

We'll leave alone the many well-intentioned public and private individuals who have succumbed to the urge to carry out free-lance diplomacy and travel to meet with our enemies. While they represent a liability to the government's ability to make/coordinate policy, their presence on enemy soil is generally high profile enough to push kidnapping to the outer realm of statistical probability.

But for those - like our intrepid journalists - who are below the radar, but who feel they are above the law... the likelihood of coming to harm becomes very real. It's all very well and good that these three felt it was worth the risk... but I contend that it wasn't only their risk to take.

The issue isn't whether there was justification to file the story: I wouldn't have done what Lisa and her colleagues did either. The issue is that the law wasn't enacted in a vacuum. The law was enacted to prevent Israelis from trying to conduct foreign policy 'for' us on a free-lance basis, and to prevent those Israelis who are privy to state secrets from spilling those secrets to our enemies. To my knowledge, Lisa is guilty of neither of the above.

As to the prospect of her being kidnapped and traded for hundreds of terrorists, there are two points that bear mentioning. First, Lisa was traveling on a Canadian passport, and thus if she had been kidnapped, the responsibility for freeing her should have fallen to Canada, not to Israel. Second, David is apparently a few years younger than I am and does not remember the days when Israel "just said no" to negotiating with terrorists. Even when they had planeloads of civilian hostages as, for example, the Sabena jet that sat on the tarmac at Ben Gurion (then Lod) Airport for several days in 1972 and the Air France flight from Tel Aviv to Paris that was hijacked to Entebbe in 1976, the government would not negotiate with them. If Lisa had been kidnapped and the government had said no to negotiations, as - sorry Lisa - they should have, Lisa's risk would clearly have been her own.

What David apparently had in mind was the Elhanan Tenenbaum situation, in which Israel freed over four hundred terrorists in exchange for a philandering drug dealer and three dead bodies. I have two responses to that. First, Israel should not have exchanged terrorists for Tenenbaum (or for dead bodies for that matter) in the first place, and we should not be assuming it will do so in the future. Second, Israel was duped into the Tenenbaum exchange because he was a high ranking army officer, who apparently did have state secrets, and Israel was told that he had been tortured. Someone high up decided that we 'needed' to get him back in order to find out what he had disclosed to Hezbullah and to prevent him from disclosing anything else. But the IDF has its own rules against traveling to enemy countries, and while Tenenbaum violated them, Lisa (and probably her colleagues as well) is not subject to them.

So why were Lisa and her colleagues called in for questioning? I don't believe it was 'persecution.' I believe it was all for show. I believe that they were called in to demonstrate the police's (and by extension the government's) 'even-handedness' at a time when they are really trying to crack down on Arab MK's visiting Syria and Lebanon and making pronouncements against Israel. Instead of admitting that there's a difference between MK's making statements of support for Hezbullah in Syria and Lebanon, the government is making a sham of 'even-handedly' applying the law by pretending that it is going to press charges (and hopefully it won't go beyond that) against Lisa and her colleagues. I believe that's a waste of police resources. It's clear to anyone with a brain in their head that Lisa visiting Beirut is not the same as Azmi Bishara visiting Beirut or Said Nafa visiting Damascus.

I have a friend in the US who has visited Cuba several times. He first visited because he's the kind of guy who will insist on doing something if you tell him he can't do it, and because he loves to travel. He traveled to Cuba through Canada. Subsequently, my friend made several more trips to Cuba due to a romantic interest there, which he has since dropped. On one trip, the Cubans stamped his passport. US immigration saw the stamp when he returned to the US and ever since then, he is subject to extra tender love and care each time he flies within, into or out of the US. But he was never prosecuted, and he is a member in good standing of the bar in his state. I don't think he's been back to Cuba since then either - he did not want to take the risk of having his passport revoked.

If Lisa wants to use her Canadian passport to travel to Beirut, as far as I am concerned that is between her and the Canadian government so long as she has no state secrets and is not doing anything that will assist our enemies in their efforts to destroy us. No, I don't consider filing a 'human interest' television report from Beirut assisting our enemies' efforts to destroy us. (Although he is not an Israeli, would anyone argue that Michael Totten's reports from Lebanon have harmed Israel? Certainly not!) Shimon Peres' poodles who traveled to Oslo and negotiated with our sworn enemy in clear violation of the law fifteen years ago did much more harm to the country than Lisa could ever do.

32 Comments:

At 11:58 AM, Blogger lisagoldman said...

Dear Carl,

Thank you so much for this balanced, intelligent and supportive post.

With best wishes,

Lisa

 
At 5:23 PM, Blogger treppenwitz said...

Carl... You said"The law was enacted to prevent Israelis from trying to conduct foreign policy 'for' us on a free-lance basis, and to prevent those Israelis who are privy to state secrets from spilling those secrets to our enemies." How do you know this? And since when did knowledge of how/why a law came into being somehow convey the authority to break it? It's like saying, "I know the reason there is a stop light there, but since I know the local traffic patterns better than the guys who programmed the lights, I can disregard it."

As far as Israel 'just saying no', you yourself pointed out that those days are a distant memory. these days we seem to be giving prisoners away for free. But I digress. The law doesn't make distinctions for whether an Israeli citizen holds a foreign passport. The bottom line is that few other countries are willing to stick out their neck to rescue/negotiate for citizens held hostage. And we have seen from countless hijackings and kidnappings in the past, that even when Israel has no 'pure' (meaning not holding secondary citizenship elsewhere) citizens in a hostage situation (such as during the 1970 Black September hijackings), those countries that do have citizens involved put tremendous pressure on Israel to make concessions in order to win the hostages release.

I was not thinking specifically of the Tannenbaum case since there are plenty of other situations where Israel has offered to trade ten, or even a hundred, times the number of prisoners for a single Israeli hostage (or part, thereof).

 
At 7:54 PM, Blogger Carl in Jerusalem said...

David,

I'm not arguing that Lisa didn't violate the law. She did.

I'm arguing that not every violation of the law is or has to be prosecuted. I would let this one go.

 
At 11:38 AM, Blogger treppenwitz said...

Carl... "not every violation of the law is or has to be prosecuted" is a very slippery slope. Obviously not everyone who speeds gets a ticket. In fact it is common knowledge that most cops give a little wiggle room over the actual speed limit to adjust to the realities on the road. But traveling to an enemy state is a bright line. In an interview I read, Lisa claimed to have been unaware of the law and I have no reason to doubt this. But ignornace of the law has never been a shield from it... and as a journalist she should have known better than to trot out such a valueless excuse.

 
At 3:44 PM, Blogger lisagoldman said...

David -

Does Zehava know about your obsession with me?

First you write a whole blog post about me; and now you're rushing around the blogosphere to comment about me, too.

I'm touched, really - especially by your insistence that I must be punished! - but trust me, we're all wrong for each other.

Farewell,

Lisa

 
At 12:29 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Lisa,

On the whole I agree with Carl.

However your last post leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Why do you need to use sexual overtones? This is totally uncalled for.

Is this something you do often? I remember Hoder and his hinting of sexual complications with you.

Regards
Ruth

 
At 12:39 PM, Blogger lisagoldman said...

Ruth -

Sometimes the only possible response to mean-spirited idiocy is a bit of humour.

Your mention of Hoder leaves a bad taste in my mouth, especially given that you and I have communicated extensively over that issue. I thought you were above that kind of innuendo. I am disappointed.

Lisa

 
At 2:41 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Mean-spirited idiocy? Hmmmm….. Lisa, do you, I wonder, have the intellectual honesty to admit that statement describes your comment?

David’s views regarding the investigation, and the collateral discussions the investigation has fostered are simply his views. Rather than address his points, you have descended into the gutter in an attempt to redirect the focus of the discussion and make it appear as though David was making a personal attack on you instead of discussing the implications of your actions.

You may think that your trip did not run the risk of kidnapping or compromising national security – but this seems to be a component to the law being on the books. And while your calculation that the risk you took was worth it for YOU – David’s assertion is that you haven’t the right to demand that others see it in the same light.

Whether or not you should be prosecuted is, ultimately, the State’s decision. But discussions about to whom the law applies is, unless I am mistaken, a right of free speech. David’s contentions that 1) ignorance of the law has never been a shield from the law, and 2) “not every violation of the law is or has to be prosecuted" is a very slippery slope can hardly be construed as a personal attack against you or a digression from the discussion at hand. In fact, you could insert any name in place of yours and the views would not change, nor would the tenor of his remarks.

There are valid questions to be raised regarding the investigation and the current law: Should journalists be allowed to travel to enemy states? If so, what degree of security does our state owe/guarantee these journalists? If not, how are the laws applied and upheld? What responsibility do employers in the media industry bear toward their employees or freelancers with regards to the law? What responsibility should the media industry bear in protecting journalists who “get caught” in enemy States? How do these various ramifications affect/impact the public?

Rather than delve into the questions the investigation raises, you chose a personal attack.

Personally, I found the combination of your stated ignorance of the law and the contention that if the law wasn’t applied in other cases that it shouldn’t be applied in yours either to be at odds with one another.

Regarding the seemingly uneven application of the law, is it possible that there was something specific to your circumstance which prompted the State to pursue further investigation? Perhaps the highly publicized nature of your visit? Perhaps it has caused repercussions for the government?

While for you, this can not be anything but personal, for those of us unconnected to the investigation it is anything but personal. It is a civic responsibility for citizens in a democracy to examine the laws by which it governs. And much as you may not want to hear this, what is best/good for you may be at direct odds with what is best for Israel’s remaining 8-million-or-so citizens.

 
At 2:32 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Lisa,

I have no reason not to believe your version of your encounter with Hoder and I have no reason to to disbelieve his version.

Still I wonder whether you might have invited his spite by using inuendos like you do vs. David.

 
At 2:33 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

make that "not to disbelieve HOder's version"

He has a track record of easily checked lies also with me...

 
At 11:48 PM, Blogger lisagoldman said...

Ruth - Shame on you.

 
At 5:43 AM, Blogger treppenwitz said...

No Lisa, Shame on YOU for not having the personal integrity to step up and respond to direct criticism of your actions and words. Who are you to say 'Shame on you' to anyone, and why should anyone care that you are 'disappointed' with them?

Seriously, do you ever stop to consider how absurd you sound... on the one hand saying that nobody has the right to judge you, and then responding with intensely judgemental comments about others.

I (and others) have raised non-personally issues related to your actions and decisions and you have responded with personal attacks.

Quite honestly, I'm the one who is disappointed! You probably think I hate you, but honestly I am just sad that someone I once considered to be a serious journalist and who I counted on for a fresh perspective to offset my own (seeing as e both live in bubbles of sorts), has turned out to be an arrogant, attention-seeking dilettante.

 
At 1:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow gold@@@@
World of Warcraft Gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
rolex replica
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
replica rolex
powerleveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
rolex
wow gold
wow gold
Warcraft Gold
Warcraft Gold

中高年 転職
アルバイト 求人情報
ブライダル
転職
競馬
FX
ダイエット
お見合い
競馬 予想
新築マンション
新築マンション
コンタクトレンズ
婚約指輪
合宿免許
人材派遣
東京都 墓地
派遣会社
人材派遣
パチンコ 攻略
おなら

货架
OCR
OCR
手机词典
高速扫描
机票
灭蟑螂
蜗轮减速机
减速机
齿轮减速机
丝杆升降机
租房
租房
北京租房
北京租房
搬家公司
北京搬家
北京搬家公司
上海机票
上海机票
上海打折机票
上海打折机票
上海特价机票
上海特价机票
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司

fbfgfjghg

 
At 6:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Today we have a higher building and wider highways
But shorter temperaments and narrow points of view
We spend more, but enjoy less;
We have bigger house, but smaller families
hard work pays off
a May sunrise
brain gain
where there is a will there is a way
the art of living
something better than money
she walks in beauty
the paper cup
love is difficult
three days to see

 
At 12:57 PM, Blogger ryou999 said...

http://www.host-job.net/

 
At 6:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

賃貸
横浜 賃貸
不動産 東京
不動産
ウィークリーマンション
バイアグラ
RAID復旧
データ復元
データ復旧
テレマーケティング
データ復旧
手 汗
手掌多汗症
メタボ対策
有料老人ホーム
基礎化粧品
法律事務所 求人
オペレーティングリース
ダイビング

 
At 5:09 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

三井ダイレクト
盲導犬
募金
障害者
治験
香川県 不動産
高松 不動産
広島 不動産
チューリッヒ
派遣
スニーカー
水虫
ゼネラリ
フランチャイズ
人材派遣
派遣会社
派遣会社
不動産投資
不動産
不動産 広島
広島 不動産
">ソニー損保
国際協力
お見合いパーティー
浮気調査
賃貸

 
At 8:50 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

出産祝い
フランチャイズ
ダイビングショップ
障害者
24そんぽ24
アメリカンホームダイレクト
人権問題
水虫
派遣会社
三井ダイレクト
募金
スニーカー
盲導犬

 
At 5:41 AM, Blogger 山家 said...

パソコン修理
動画配信/ストリーミング配信
印刷
ネイルサロン
水素水
学習塾/個別指導/ITTO
成人式写真
フォトウェディング
アクセス解析
ゲストハウス 東京
リフォーム 神奈川
賃貸 大阪
ウィークリーマンション 名古屋
タイ古式マッサージ
フロアコーティング
インプラント
債務整理
中古パソコン
ネイリスト
携帯 買取
結婚指輪
契約書
電話占い
オーラソーマ
エステ 東京
基礎化粧品アジュペック
整体院
基礎化粧品
化粧品 通販
売掛金回収
瞑想
文書管理
結婚教会
guest house
ケアベア
コイン
ポスティング
シリコンウエハー/半導体製造装置
インディバ
ウィークリーマンション
ウィークリーマンション 名古屋
ウィークリーマンション 大阪
青梅 不動産
羽村 不動産
福生 不動産
審美歯科
株 セミナー
電話占い
電話占い
トランクルーム
練馬 賃貸
結婚写真
国内 航空券
リンガフォン
デコメ
キャッシング
モバイルSEO
デコメ
キャッシング

 
At 4:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

クレジットカード 現金化
人材派遣
東京 土地
アクサ
アクサダイレクト 行政書士
チューリッヒ
三井ダイレクト 債務整理
有料老人ホーム
手形割引
ペットショップ 東京
東京 一戸建て
不動産 東京
ドロップシッピング
クレジットカード 現金化
ショッピング枠 現金化
現金化
医院開業
不動産担保ローン
為替
看護
ブライダル
ウェディング
結婚式
格安航空券
オーガニック
ブライダル
ウェディング
結婚式
ダイビング ペアリング
沖縄旅行
ショッピング枠 現金化
インプラント
為替
外国為替
引越
副業
バイク買取
美容整形
中高年 転職
外為
FX
出会い系
出会い系

 
At 4:49 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

高松 不動産
広島 不動産
チューリッヒ
スニーカー
ゼネラリ
アメリカンホームダイレクト
フランチャイズ
不動産投資
不動産
不動産 広島
広島 不動産
セルライト
国際協力

 
At 4:50 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

お見合いパーティー
浮気調査
徳島 不動産
松山市 不動産
賃貸
ソニー損保
高知 不動産
群馬 不動産
埼玉 不動産
プレゼント 男の子用
婚約指輪
結婚指輪
自動車保険 比較
アクサダイレクト
ゼネラリ
自動車 保険 見積
出産祝い
徳島 不動産
松山市 不動産

 
At 4:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

不動産投資 システム開発 札幌 不動産 仙台 不動産 大阪 不動産 横浜 不動産 名古屋 不動産 福岡 不動産 京都 不動産 埼玉 不動産 千葉 不動産 静岡 不動産 神戸 不動産 浜松 不動産 堺市 不動産 川崎市 不動産 相模原市 不動産 姫路 不動産 岡山 不動産 明石 不動産 鹿児島 不動産 北九州市 不動産 熊本 不動産 インテリアコーディネータ リフォーム 東京 リフォーム 大阪 不動産 査定 不動産 買取 不動産 売買 不動産 鑑定 不動産 売却 サイトを検索すると会社があったよくみると賃貸 住宅も収益物件も不動産 賃貸も賃貸マンションも新築マンションもしっかりカバーしてありすごく充実したさいとでもちろん投資を目的の方やリフォームをしたい人もすごく参考になるだう。ところで今、SEO対策などいまはやっているがホームページ制作会社にいらいしてもうまくはいかないようだ。最近私は、資産運用にこっていて税金対策にインテリアを集めている。もちろんファッションにこだわりブランド品や下着にはこだわりがある。 化粧品も高価なものがよく家具も最高級しか買わない、先日海外旅行にいってきてお土産に外車と結婚指輪と高級時計をかったが、日本でしらべたら通販ですごく安く売っていた。
今、会社の寮で賃貸を探してまして全部で12都市で社員が住みます場所は、福岡 賃貸,広島 賃貸,川崎 賃貸,神戸 賃貸,京都 賃貸,名古屋 賃貸,大阪 賃貸,埼玉 賃貸,札幌 賃貸,仙台 賃貸,千葉 賃貸,横浜 賃貸の政令指定都市が対象です不動産と賃貸と投資とは収益物件探し新築の住宅はアパートとマンションの土地から不動産投資

 
At 4:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

不動産投資 システム開発 札幌 不動産 仙台 不動産 大阪 不動産 横浜 不動産 名古屋 不動産 福岡 不動産 京都 不動産 埼玉 不動産 千葉 不動産 静岡 不動産 神戸 不動産 浜松 不動産 堺市 不動産 川崎市 不動産 相模原市 不動産 姫路 不動産 岡山 不動産 明石 不動産 鹿児島 不動産 北九州市 不動産 熊本 不動産 不動産 賃貸 収益物件 新築 住宅 アパート マンション 土地 不動産投資 インテリアコーディネータ リフォーム 東京 リフォーム 大阪 土壌汚染 不動産 査定 不動産 買取 不動産 売買 不動産 鑑定 不動産 売却 広島 賃貸 賃貸

 
At 4:07 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

募金
盲導犬
群馬 不動産
治験
出産祝い
クレジットカード決済
アクサダイレクト
障害者
24そんぽ24
アメリカンホームダイレクト
自動車保険
自動車保険 比較
チューリッヒ
自動車 保険 見積
出会い
出会い系
出会い系サイト
出会いサイト

 
At 4:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

深圳翻译公司,知名深圳翻译公司

广州翻译公司
上海翻译公司,东莞翻译公司国内同声翻译(同声传译)领域领头军!同声传译(同传)是国际会议通常使用的翻译方式,这种形式的翻译方式需要较为复杂的

设备以及非常专业的翻译人员, 翻译人员进入隔音间里

,通过耳机接听发言人的声音再将其翻译给听众。但能节省大量的时间。优质翻译公司译佰

翻译公司
能提供同传深圳德语翻译深圳俄语翻译深圳韩语翻译等数种同传语言,培养一批商务口译人员,多年以来,

译佰同声翻译在同声传译(同传)领域积累了丰富

的业务经验,能提供从专业同声翻译、译员培训到同传设备安装租售业务等一整

套国际会议同传服务,深圳翻译公司,专业深圳英语翻译 深圳日语翻译深圳法语翻译

 
At 11:52 AM, Blogger pcstyle said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 4:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

ダンボール(オーダー段ボール箱、板)・プチプチ(ぷちぷち)袋・各種緩衝材など梱包資材(用品)が小ロットからご注文いただける激安販売(通販)専門店です。当社の人気商品は1.オーダープチプチ袋通販・ネットショップの必需品大小お好みのサイズにアレンジ可能です! 2.オーダー白ダンボール(白ダンボール)高級品通販ショップ御用達品質と美しさが評価されて, 当店の大人気商品です!! 3.ギター用ダンボール楽器店・ギター愛好家御用達他では買えないボックスバンクオリジナルなどです!http://www.boxbank.jp

 
At 6:54 AM, Blogger hed said...

SEO対策 基本
格安ホテル
SEO 役立つツール
SEO対策
新宿 ホテル
新宿 中野 ホテル
SEO対策 最新情報
ECサイト WEBデザイン
SEO対策 順位アップ
京都 ホテル
直前予約 ホテル
ETC クレジットカード
クレジットカード
エステとは
fx
ウィークリーマンション
WEBデザイン プロモーション
ショートステイ
ホームページ デザイン
格安 ホテル
大阪 ホテル
ホテル リンク
クレジットカード キャッシュバック

 
At 6:55 AM, Blogger hed said...

SEO対策 基本
格安ホテル
SEO 役立つツール
SEO対策
新宿 ホテル
新宿 中野 ホテル
SEO対策 最新情報
ECサイト WEBデザイン
SEO対策 順位アップ
京都 ホテル
直前予約 ホテル
ETC クレジットカード
クレジットカード
エステとは
fx
ウィークリーマンション
WEBデザイン プロモーション
ショートステイ
ホームページ デザイン
格安 ホテル
大阪 ホテル
ホテル リンク
クレジットカード キャッシュバック

 
At 10:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
cfrais
enmage
epson
kodisk
metato
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

 
At 10:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

コンタクトレンズ
幼児教室
システム開発
債務整理
多重債務
遺品整理
印鑑

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google