Stop funding UNRWA!
At The American Thinker, Moshe Dann reminds us of some of the many reasons why UNRWA perpetuates a
fraud and should not be funded.
No Arab country except Jordan -- where they constitute more than two-thirds of the population - accepts them as citizens. Saudi Arabia, for example, recently passed a law allowing all foreigner workers in the country to apply for Saudi citizenship next year - except Palestinians.
More than 400,000 "Palestinian refugees" living in UNWRA-supported "camps" in Lebanon cannot work or even go to school outside their designated areas. Ditto for Syria.
Most "Palestinian refugees" listed by UNRWA (which includes Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, West Bank and Gaza) in 2002, don't even live in the camps, but in nearby villages and towns. All receive free assistance and services for the rest of their life, including their children, their grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, ad infinitum.
According to UNRWA's rules, anyone who applied for relief, claiming they lived in Palestine for at least two years prior to 1948 (when Israel was attacked) and claimed to have lost property and livelihood was entitled to assistance, regardless of where they came from, or where they live today. Once a "Palestinian refugee," always a "Palestinian refugee."
That explains why the number of "Palestinian refugees" who receive aid has grown from a few hundred thousand to four and a half million (although no one really knows the exact numbers because of UNRWA's faulty records). That number could double in a generation - along with UNRWA's nearly half-billion-dollar annual budget.
UNRWA is supposed to verify that those who receive assistance don't work. Not surprisingly, however, no one checks. No one confirms the validity of those who receive benefits from UNRWA. After death, certificates of eligibility are simply passed on to others. No one checks bank accounts, automobile registrations, or property ownership.
With multiple wives, families can comprise scores of children - all "refugees." And, according to UNRWA rules, even if one parent is "Palestinian," the entire family is eligible for assistance and "refugee" status.
UNRWA openly admits that they don't monitor programs that support terrorism, or payments to families of terrorists by the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, Hezb'allah and (until recently) Iraq's Saddam Hussein.
In fact, nearly all teachers employed by UNRWA are members of terrorist-controlled unions. Funding these teachers and the curriculum of hatred and bigotry, supports terrorism and terrorist organizations. This may explain why so many children are willing to blow themselves up, carry weapons and explosives and place themselves as shields for terrorists.
Although responsible for what goes on in the areas it administers, UNRWA ignores the fact that terrorists are being trained there, including the next generation of homicide bombers, that bomb-making factories flourish inside the camps, and that arms and ammunition are stockpiled there.
UNRWA ignores the launching of thousands of rocket attacks against Israel from within territory under its responsibility.
And most outrageous, UNRWA is accountable only to the UN General Assembly, dominated by the 56-member Organization of Islamic Conference which is also part of the 115-member Non-Aligned Movement -- an automatic majority in the 191-member U.N.
So why does the US continue to pick up one third of the tab for this fraud year after year?
5 Comments:
Carl:
The article says: According to UNRWA's rules, anyone who applied for relief, claiming they lived in Palestine for at least two years prior to 1948 (when Israel was attacked) and claimed to have lost property and livelihood was entitled to assistance, regardless of where they came from, or where they live today.
This is insane.
My great-grandfather lived in Jerusalem for more than 2 years, prior to 1948, and had no particular means of support.
Doesn't that mean that I would qualify for "palestinian refugee" status?
These people are lunatics...
Michael,
Jews aren't eligible for assistance by UNRWA.
This is one of the topics discussed extensively by Joan Peters in From Time Immemorial. The book is must reading (although not exactly entertaining like a novel) for anyone who wants to understand how the fraud called the 'Palestinians' was perpetrated on us.
Carl:
Are not eligible because we're specifically excluded, all other qualifications being met?
Or, do they just not serve Jews?
I only pointed out that I fit their definition because their definition is lunacy.
Not eligible because they don't serve Jews and because we would have a more difficult time proving that we lost our property and livelihood as a result of being displaced by the war.
Our ancestors didn't flee when the Arab League told them to flee.
Not eligible because they don't serve Jews
Thanks for the clarification. That's what I thought.
It's still a lunatic definition, though. Has it ever occurred to them that keeping people as stateless refugees for 4 or 5 generations is just demeaning?
Post a Comment
<< Home