Which statement is stupider?
I'm conducting a poll - answer in the comments section.Defenseless Defense Minister
1. "[The] Saudi peace initiative should be considered a possible base for a diplomatic process," the defense minister said.So here's the poll question (and it's a tough one to answer): Which statement by Peretz do you think was stupider and why?
2. "The stability of [the current government] is in the national interest of Israel," Defense Minister Amir Peretz said Sunday evening. "[The government] is a strategic asset. It is wonderful," Peretz said. "I [also] hope that soon is the day that people will realize what an asset it is to have a socially-aware defense minister."
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 11:35 PM
2 Comments:
Number 2 is stupider only because there are more words in it.
Some things are not quantifiable.
The depths of Peretz's incompetence in his current position, and the sheer stupidity of his public statements, are among them.
Post a Comment
<< Home