Powered by WebAds

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Gov't considers allowing some 'illegal outposts'

For someone who keeps telling us how he's won the election and the only question is how many Knesset seats and whom he will need to form a coalition, Ehud Olmert sure seems to be worried that he will neeed votes from the right. This morning, the Olmert government arranges for a 'trial balloon' to be floated in the Jerusalem Post, suggesting that the government is 'considering' legalizing some of the 'illegal outposts' that Olmert keeps promising the United States will go (the fact that many of them are perfectly legal escapes the geniouses in the government). With one week to election day and a lot of 'undecided' voters, Olmert sure seems worried:

There is discussion of a plan to "legalize" some unauthorized settlement outposts if they fall inside settlement blocs Israel ultimately plans to keep, and if the outposts themselves meet certain criteria, senior Israeli officials told The Jerusalem Post.

According to the officials, these criteria include that the outposts serve a clear security need, such as guarding an access road to the outpost's mother settlement; that they were built on state land and not private Arab property, that they fall within the mother settlement's master plan and are in areas which Israel intends to keep. [Except for being in areas that 'Israel intends to keep,' which is the wild card, I would guess that every 'outpost' meets these criteria. CiJ]

The "outpost plan" was first brought to the Defense Ministry by the IDF in an attempt to appease the settlers and to strengthen the official settler leadership, which has been weakened by the recent razing of nine illegal homes at the Amona outpost and the failure to stop the disengagement last summer from the Gaza Strip. The plan entailed the evacuation of close to 15 illegal outposts but called for the approval of another 10.

The officials, who asked not to be identified, said settlement leaders had for some time been talking about a plan whereby they would voluntarily leave many of the more than 100 outposts if others would then become "authorized."

While the officials claimed there was an ongoing dialogue between the settler leadership and Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on the issue, Emily Amrusi, spokeswoman for the Council of Jewish Communities in Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip, denied there were any contacts. [In other words, this is an Olmert trial balloon. They want to see how loudly 'Peace Now' and the American State Department will scream. CiJ]

"We have tried to meet with him but he has repeatedly refused," Amrusi said. "We have absolutely no contact with him."

The officials said that only outposts in areas that Israel has made clear would remain in its hands would be considered. According to these criteria, therefore, the unauthorized outpost of Amona would not have fallen into this category. [The implication of this sentence is that Ofra - which is 'Amona's' "mother settlement" - will not be kept. But see the last sentence of the next paragraph. CiJ]

Outposts that are today considered illegal which could fall under the plan include Nof Kana and Alonei Shilo near the settlement of Karnei Shomron, which according to Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz would remain part of Israel under a withdrawal from the West Bank. [Into which 'settlement bloc' does Karnei Shomron fall? Ariel? CiJ] Other outposts near Ofra and Beit El could also be approved, depending on the future of their mother settlements. [I believe 'Amona' met all the criteria except for the 'mother settlement.' But of course, the government cannot admit that now - especially since they may put Ofra on the "keep" list - after the pogrom they carried out there. CiJ]

"There is no sense or logic in legalizing or authorizing outposts near settlements that themselves are slated to be relocated," one official said.

The official said he did not know how many of the 24 unauthorized settlements set up since March 2001, which Prime Minister Ariel Sharon pledged to the US that he would dismantle, would fit the necessary criteria, but military officials said there could be up to 10 that would be in line for approval.

Diplomatic officials said no consultations on this matter had been held with the US. The formal US position is that the outposts set up after Sharon formed his first government must be dismantled as stipulated under the road map. The assumption, however, is that there would be room to talk to the administration about this if some of the 81 other outposts that were set up before March 2001 and are not in areas considered major settlement blocs were to be dismantled.

Following the elections next week, Amrusi said, the settler council planned to present its own outpost plan to the government to try and reach a compromise regarding the fate of the illegal outposts. [Ah, but Emily, the whole point is that Olmert needs help in the elections. CiJ]

The plan, she said, would include the transfer of several outposts to other settlements and the legalization of others and their merger with nearby settlements.

I don't know what the rest of you make of this, but in my opinion, more than anything else, this shows that the real poll numbers (as opposed to what you read in the papers) are nowhere near as good for Kadima Achora as they are claimed to be. Ehud Olmert is in trouble. He is looking for votes on the right. And not just to avoid going into a coaltion with Labor or Likud. You heard it here first.


1 Comments:

At 12:30 AM, Blogger Yoel.Ben-Avraham said...

My thoughts .. this is nothing but pre-election attempts to 'buy' some of the undecided who believe Jews have a right to settle the Land ... a little ...

Don't believe a bit of it will ever be acted upon!

Yoel Ben-Avraham
Shilo, Benyamin

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Google