Israel Matzav

A recent remark by a senior Israeli military officer is particularly worthy of note, if only because of its terrifying significance for the future of the nation's campaign against Palestinian terror.

In a briefing to journalists late on Monday, IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz addressed the issue of ongoing Palestinian Kassam rocket attacks against Israeli towns and cities.

In the past week alone, Palestinian rockets have hit the western Negev, Kibbutz Nir Am, Kibbutz Nahal Oz, and Highway 34 near Sderot, and the terrorists are said to be perfecting missiles with an even longer range.

"In order to deal with the Kassams," Halutz said, "we would need to breach various constraints that we have imposed upon ourselves, moral constraints and others, that we do not wish to breach, and I do not recommend that we do so." The chief of staff later explained that he was referring to more aggressive counterterror operations designed to stop the rocket launchings against Israel, as these would inevitably harm innocent Palestinian civilians.

At first glance there would appear to be something eminently admirable in Halutz's approach. After all, Israel has long prided itself on its efforts to minimize harm to innocent civilians caught in the crossfire, and it is doubtful that any other country in the world would go to such lengths while under rocket attack from a neighbor.

AND YET, however humane and noble such sentiments might be, they are woefully misplaced. The morality of avoiding Palestinian civilian casualties may be unquestionable, but the failure to protect Israel's citizens is downright unconscionable.

What Halutz is saying, in effect, is that Israel has the means and the ability to stop Palestinian rocket attacks which threaten innocent Israelis, but that it prefers not to do so for fear of harming innocent Palestinians.

This moral calculus is as twisted as it is ineffective, because it essentially places a higher value on the lives of Palestinian civilians than on those of Israeli civilians. Forced to choose between whom to endanger, the chief of staff has chosen the latter even though he is sworn to protect the former.

This is not only a dereliction of duty but a recipe for disaster, inviting our enemies to continue to attack us even as the army fights with one hand tied behind its back. The IDF has sharply limited the extent of its operations against the burgeoning rocket threat, contenting itself with half-hearted and largely unsuccessful efforts.

As Israel's leading military analyst, Zeev Schiff, recently noted, the continuation of the Palestinian rocket attacks "testifies to a failure of Israeli deterrence."

He continued, "In the Gaza Strip the security forces have also not succeeded in locating the workshops that produce the Kassams, and most of the metal shops and rocket developers have not been hit." [Maybe that just might be connected with the fact that the IDF is no longer in Gaza and is trying to hit from the outside? Nah, why would anyone think that? CiJ]

What Halutz seems to have forgotten is that the military's primary responsibility is to ensure the safety and security of the nation and its citizens. That is its paramount obligation; it overrides all others. [Sad to say, I don't think he's forgotten it. I think he's done what most of our moonbats have done: they have decided that avoiding 'civilian' casualties among the 'Palestinians' is more important than saving Israeli lives. Do you think I'm exaggerating? Look no further than the 'High Court of Justice' rulings over the 'security fence' route. What's the priority there? It's not saving Israeli lives.... CiJ]

By imposing his dubious brand of morality on Israel's defense policy, Halutz has transformed Israel into the equivalent of a neighborhood high-school wimp who meekly avoids confronting those who torment him.

Read it all....