Powered by WebAds

Thursday, June 02, 2011

The UN cannot create a 'Palestinian state'

In the Wall Street Journal, Lebanese-born Fouad Ajami explains why the 'Palestinians' cannot appropriate the Israeli narrative by appealing to the United Nations General Assembly for a 'state.'
The Palestinians have misread what transpired at the General Assembly in 1947. True, the cause of Jewish statehood had been served by the vote on partition, but the Zionist project had already prevailed on the ground. Jewish statehood was a fait accompli perhaps a decade before that vote. All the ingredients had been secured by Labor Zionism. There was a military formation powerful enough to defeat the Arab armies, there were political institutions in place, and there were gifted leaders, David Ben-Gurion pre-eminent among them, who knew what can be had in the world of nations.

The vote at the General Assembly was of immense help, but it wasn't the decisive factor in the founding of the Jewish state. The hard work had been done in the three decades between the Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the vote on partition. Realism had guided the Zionist project. We will take a state even if it is the size of a tablecloth, said Chaim Weizmann, one of the founding fathers of the Zionist endeavor.

Sadly, the Palestinian national movement has known a different kind of leadership, unique in its mix of maximalism and sense of entitlement, in its refusal to accept what can and can't be had in the world of nations. Leadership is often about luck, the kind of individuals a people's history brings forth. It was the distinct misfortune of the Palestinians that when it truly mattered, and for nearly four decades, they were led by a juggler, Yasser Arafat, a man fated to waste his people's chances.


There was hope that the Arafat legacy would go with him to the grave.The new Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas had been a lieutenant of Arafat's, but there were hints of a break with the Arafat legacy. The alliance between Fatah and Hamas that Mr. Abbas has opted for put these hopes to rest. And the illusion that the U.N. can break the stalemate in the Holy Land is vintage Arafat. It was Arafat who turned up at the General Assembly in 1974 with a holster on his hip, and who proclaimed that he had come bearing a freedom fighter's gun and an olive branch, and that it was up to the U.N. not to let the olive branch fall from his hand.

For the Palestinians there can be no escape from negotiations with Israel. The other Arabs shall not redeem Palestinian rights. They have their own burdens to bear. In this Arab Spring, this season of popular uprisings, little has been said in Tunis and Cairo and Damascus and Sanaa about Palestine.

The General Assembly may, in September, vote to ratify a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood. But true Palestinian statehood requires convincing a decisive Israeli majority that statehood is a herald for normalcy in that contested land, for Arabs and Jews alike.
Ajami is spot-on. But what he omits is the fact that there is probably even less likelihood of a truly moderate 'Palestinian' leadership emerging now than there was seven years ago. Abu Mazen's behavior was predictable to anyone who looked at the man's background. But what wasn't as predictable was the systematic way in which the 'Palestinian leadership' from both Fatah and Hamas has used the media to poison any prospects for peace. If anything, Abu Mazen's successor is likely to be even more extreme and to look a lot more like Hamas.

Read the whole thing.

Labels: , , , , ,


At 3:08 PM, Blogger Juniper in the Desert said...

Re: your post on coldplay and their anti-Israel anthem: I have done some research and put it up here:


The funding is people like the Methodists and other suspect mozlem groups


Post a Comment

<< Home