Powered by WebAds

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Guess who's joining the 'Human Rights Council'

Fresh from leading the OIC effort to kill the UN's effort to enact a universal definition of terrorism, Syria is joining the UN 'Human Rights Council.'
Syria is currently running for a seat on the U.N.’s flagship “human rights” body, the Human Rights Council. Seats are allocated to five regional groups, and just to make sure Syria’s ascendancy is unimpeded, the Asian group has only nominated the same number of states as they have seats. So barring any unexpected additions, Syria will join fellow U.N. human rights authorities like Saudi Arabia on the Council in May.

The U.N. does have a “test” for Human Rights Council wannabes. They call it a pledge system – candidates should promise to protect human rights. In the words of the 2006 General Assembly resolution that created the Council (the Bush administration and Israel casting a negative vote), when electing candidates “voluntary pledges and commitments made” “to the promotion and protection of human rights” should be “taken into account.”

Syria has been a quick study. Its pledge, obligingly posted on the U.N. website, says: “Promotion and protection of human rights are of highest importance to Syria…Syria’s candidature to the Human Rights Council signifies its commitment to respect and to support the inalienable and indivisible nature of all human rights.”
And the Obama administration is helping the Syrian candidacy along.
That might be another bad joke. Except that the Obama administration announced on March 30 that it was so “pleased to note the landmark achievements of the most recent session of the U.N. Human Rights Council” that it was going to seek a second term. That characterization of the Council’s main March session is somewhat dubious, at least if the administration cared at all about the concept of equality and the welfare of Israel. The last session was the worst on record for the demonization of the Jewish state, the Council adopting more anti-Israel resolutions in one sitting than ever before. The wildly premature announcement – the U.S. term will end in December 31, 2012 according to a new General Assembly deal – erases any possibility of using prospective U.S. membership or associated dollars as clout.
What could go wrong?

Read the whole thing (it includes the story about how Syria prevented the UN from defining terrorism).

Labels: , , , ,


At 3:56 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

Hi Carl.
At first when i read it i thought it was a joke,now i realise it's real,why not just change the name of the organisation in the Islamic nations?Human rights have been abolished for Islamic sharia law, the whole UN is a mockery of Human rights principles.


Post a Comment

<< Home