I haven't seen the story yet, but I don't particularly like the title. Will this one cause as much trouble as last week's cover? (For those who are not in the US, last week's cover was arguably soft porn - it was a woman openly breast-feeding a boy who looked a little too big for that).
Disgusting cover from a disgusting magazine. I am surprised anyone still reads Time nowadays, anyway. They think being "provocative" (i.e., bigoted antisemites) will sell magazines. This shows how desperate they are.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Red Tulips. Time 'magazine' is a disgrace to the world. All copies should be thrown into a barrel and burned promptly. May Time magazine, all its writers and publishers, be unemployed by this time next year.
ReplyDeleteIf Time wants to crown someone King of Israel, they should look no further than the White House.
ReplyDeleteThe history of TIME is that it's always been a hate rag. It just varied on whom it hates. In the 60's and 70's it was insanely OPPOSED to the left, to the extent that the versions it sent to US schools had all articles about the US political left removed from them. Now it sells magazines by being antisemitic. No wonder there.
ReplyDeleteWhat are you all getting so upset about, it's only the American media doing it's worst as usual. See article in Ha'Aretz: http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/diplomania/quality-time-with-king-bibi.premium-1.431154
ReplyDeleteHi Carl.
ReplyDeleteMore on this story here:
http://docstalk.blogspot.com/2012/05/jewish-protesters-ejected-from-amb.html
At least there isn't a three-year old at this chest.
ReplyDelete